“There are as many histories as there are historians.” These words said by E.H. Carr are more than true in the case of the Guptas. The Gupta period has been subjected to a lot of scrutiny after the discovery of their records and deciphering their documents. While understanding if the Gupta age was really a Golden age in the history of India, we should first study the various kind of perspectives that existed. The various kinds of historiographies can be easily divided on their style of writing in various forms like colonialist’s historians, imperialists’ historians, nationalist historians and so on. So if colonialist’s historians would present history in such a manner so as to favour the colonials then the nationalists would present history in order to encourage nationalism and favour the sentiments of the indigenous population of the country. It is actually the Indian nationalist historians who have given the epithet of the golden age to the Gupta period. Failing to latch on to anything else, the Indian historians justifiably seized upon the documents of the Guptas and used them as a counter argument to the persistent British imperialist propaganda that India had no history except for a series of conquests by a succession of invaders. For historians writing in the early twentieth century, the “Golden age” had to be a utopia set in the distant past, and the period chosen by those working on the early history of India was one in which they perceived that the Hindu culture came to be firmly established. The glorification of Gupta period, at the time of the independence movement might have been seen as necessary but it no longer is. Hence, we should first understand why the Gupta period is seen as a golden age and see if it actually applies to them.